Sadly, the willingness of malicious users to abuse this service has made it part of numerous ongoing threats. Several denial-of-service attacks use DNS recursion to amplify their effect, sometimes in conjunction with the abuse of other well-intentioned Internet features like RFC 2671 (Extension Mechanisms for DNS - EDNS). These extension functions require name servers to return much larger responses to queries, thus enabling attacks with much higher UDP response amplifications.
However, just like open relays, which were a good idea for email until they became abused by spammers, open recursive DNS servers have also been frowned upon. US-CERT now recommends that "where possible, organizations should secure their DNS servers to ensure that they do not allow recursion or, at a minimum, restrict access to only trusted domains and disable the ability to send additional delegation information." The US-CERT document, cited above, provides detailed instructions for secure DNS configuration.
In other words, turn off or close the recursion function, which is on by default in many versions of DNS serverware. An open recursive DNS server puts an organization -- and the Internet at large -- at greater risk than a non-recursive or closed recursive DNS server would. Major hosting companies like GoDaddy.com Inc. feel the same way. Its official site warns operators of dedicated servers, saying that: "We do not allow recursive DNS to run on dedicated or virtual dedicated servers unless it runs locally and for a specific IP range."
There are some dissenting voices, notably David Ulevitch, CEO of OpenDNS, which offers a free open recursive DNS service. He was critical of the conclusions drawn by researchers from Georgia Tech and Google that there were around 17 million open-recursive DNS servers on the Internet, of which 68,000 or roughly 0.4% were answering DNS queries with false information, redirecting people to malicious sites. While not arguing with the numbers, Ulevitch pointed out that the researchers were only able to test open recursive DNS name servers, and there is no reason to think closed servers were not also acting maliciously.
The bottom line is that enterprise DNS security needs to be made a greater priority, for the sake of the organization and its ability to withstand future denial-of-service attacks, as well as for the sake of the Net as a whole. This will be no small task. It is estimated that there are more than 11 million DNS servers on the Internet today, at least half of which allow recursive queries and more than 30% allow zone transfers or synchronization among domain zones. Not all of the world's DNS servers are insecure, but even if 90% were secure, that would leave over a million to worry about.
Dig Deeper on Enterprise Data Governance
Related Q&A from Michael Cobb
A privacy breach at ClixSense led to user account details being put up for sale. Expert Michael Cobb explains how companies should be held ...continue reading
A password-verification flaw in iOS 10 allowed attackers to decrypt local backups. Expert Michael Cobb explains how removing certain security checks ...continue reading
HTTP public key pinning, a security mechanism to prevent fraudulent certificates, was not used by Firefox, and left it open to attack. Expert Michael...continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.