As an example, let's take a pharmaceutical company that sells drugs on the Internet. The marketing department may want to mine the collected user data in order to fashion a new advertising campaign. To prevent privacy breaches through data inference, it is critical that this data is anonymized prior to being analyzed. Data anonymization allows analysis to take place, but ensures that no sensitive information can be learned about a specific...
individual. The process is a lot harder than it may seem. Even a combination of non-personal data can be exploited to deduce who a record could belong to.
Using our example, even if the dataset given to the sales department has had individual customer names and email addresses removed, research shows that about half the U.S. population can be identified just from three pieces of information: date of birth, gender and place. If a zip code is available, the figure rises to 85%. Date of birth, gender and place would provide useful information for an advertising campaign, but taken together they could potentially enable a salesperson to re-associate a customer with their purchase records, causing what is called a re-identification disclosure. If these purchases were for drugs to treat a particular illness, the salesperson could deduce that the customer had a particular disease, resulting in a predictive disclosure and a breach of his or her privacy.
When analyzing Web application data, it is important that you take steps to anonymize it. The inclusion of any sensitive data should be carefully considered. Unfortunately, data anonymization is still really in its infancy. Disguising or hiding certain data in the original dataset can provide general privacy protection while still allowing reasonably accurate analysis. Instead of providing date of birth, for example, an alternative could be to use age groups. However, the only effective way to prevent disclosures like the one above is to remove analytically valuable information from the dataset. Finally, another important warning: when testing a new system, real customer data should never be used.
Dig deeper on Web Application Security
Related Q&A from Michael Cobb
A reported 43% of Microsoft XML users are running vulnerable versions of the software. Security expert Michael Cobb discusses how to mitigate the ...continue reading
Security expert Michael Cobb explains what Open Authorization or OAuth 2.0 is, its pros and cons, and how it is different from bring your own ...continue reading
While the fundamentals of securing an e-commerce website haven't changed in a few years, there are new threat vectors and security risks to be aware ...continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.