How does the method of fighting "bad" botnets with "good" botnets work? How effective is this as an enterprise defense method?
Security researchers generally view these as a bad idea, although there has been some exciting research from the University of Washington centered on a project called Phalanx (pdf). The idea is that any server requests would have to be processed through the "good" botnet, which is geographically dispersed. Because a large number of servers are implemented as intermediaries, it becomes difficult to overwhelm one specific network link.
Still, as I stated earlier, I believe that this is a bad idea, for two reasons. First, think about how hard it is to secure existing systems. Now, expand that by a few thousand systems directly accessible from the Internet. This scenario leads directly to my second fear: control. Imagine the public relations nightmare should your good botnet be taken over and used to DoS someone else's network.
I propose that instead of building counter-botnets, security professionals could better spend their time tracking the patch-installation success rate for the systems they currently have. Leave the bot-herding to the bad guys.
- Learn more about fast-flux botnets and the threats they pose.
- How risky is it to log into a botnet control channel? Learn about the possible security threats.
Dig deeper on Malware, Viruses, Trojans and Spyware
Related Q&A from John Strand, featured expert
Expert John Strand reveals two exciting trends in antivirus software.continue reading
Expert John Strand reviews how to spot input validation flaws on your websites.continue reading
Expert John Strand explains how to shore up security as you plan a large-scale advertising campaign.continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.