Can we sue Microsoft for writing years of horrible code?

Can we sue Microsoft for writing years of horrible code?

Can we sue Microsoft for writing years of horrible code and for causing many of the today's infosec headaches?

    Requires Free Membership to View

    SearchSecurity.com members gain immediate and unlimited access to breaking industry news, virus alerts, new hacker threats, highly focused security newsletters, and more -- all at no cost. Join me on SearchSecurity.com today!

    Michael S. Mimoso, Editorial Director

    By submitting your registration information to SearchSecurity.com you agree to receive email communications from TechTarget and TechTarget partners. We encourage you to read our Privacy Policy which contains important disclosures about how we collect and use your registration and other information. If you reside outside of the United States, by submitting this registration information you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Your use of SearchSecurity.com is governed by our Terms of Use. You may contact us at webmaster@TechTarget.com.

During the years, as Microsoft has distributed what you call 'horrible code,' it has done so by contract. A user always has to agree to a Microsoft contract before installing or using Mircosoft products. The user is not forced to use Microsoft; there are and always have been alternatives. But when the user decides to use a Microsoft product and voluntarily elects to enter the Microsoft contract, the user agrees that Microsoft's liability is limited. Hence the ability of the user to sue Microsoft for poor quality is slim, and I don't see the law changing on that point any time soon.
For more info on this topic, visit these SearchSecurity.com resources:
  • Featured Topic: Microsoft's Trustworthy Computing Initiative

    This was first published in May 2004