Requires Free Membership to View
When it comes to IT controls, auditors look to see if policies and procedures are in place to protect sensitive customer and financial data. Proof of these controls is enshrined in documentation outlining IT security policies, procedures and how data is protected. These safeguards could include access control, encryption, firewall architectures and virus protection. Your auditors are probably concerned that using the Administrator account is a weak form of server access control. They probably think these servers contain sensitive financial information that, if not properly secured, could be compromised.
Auditors love paper, and the best way to change the policy you described is to perform a thorough risk analysis of your servers and the data they host. If you can prove to the auditors -- and document it with the risk analysis -- that the data isn't sensitive and there's a low risk of exposure, you may be able to keep using the Administrator account, but plan carefully. Ask yourself the following questions: What data do these servers host? How sensitive is it? Is it confidential customer information, insider financial reports or harmless marketing data for projecting sales? Is use of the servers limited to a small group or widespread throughout your enterprise?
Again, auditors love paper, so whatever you do, document it.
More information
- Attend our SOX Security
School to learn how to meet SOX's on-going demands.
- Read this book chapter to review basic approaches to risk analysis.
-
This was first published in January 2006
Security Management Strategies for the CIO
Join the conversationComment
Share
Comments
Results
Contribute to the conversation