HIPAA and Social Security numbers in a hospital computer network

HIPAA and Social Security numbers in a hospital computer network

Currently, a hospital information system uses Social Security numbers as one of the key fields for patient identification. This system enables the merging of patients' info into an enterprise patient ID. Is the use of Social Security numbers by this system considered a HIPAA violation? If so, would redesigning the entire patient ID system be the only answer?

    Requires Free Membership to View

    SearchSecurity.com members gain immediate and unlimited access to breaking industry news, virus alerts, new hacker threats, highly focused security newsletters, and more -- all at no cost. Join me on SearchSecurity.com today!

    Michael S. Mimoso, Editorial Director

    By submitting your registration information to SearchSecurity.com you agree to receive email communications from TechTarget and TechTarget partners. We encourage you to read our Privacy Policy which contains important disclosures about how we collect and use your registration and other information. If you reside outside of the United States, by submitting this registration information you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Your use of SearchSecurity.com is governed by our Terms of Use. You may contact us at webmaster@TechTarget.com.

Use of Social Security numbers (SSNs) is not a violation of HIPAA unless the number is used in such a way that it is clearly exposed to the public. So, as an example, if an organization is using Social Security numbers as the patient identifier, the full ID cannot be displayed on member cards. Similarly, computer monitors need to be set up so that patients' Personal Health Information (PHI), including their SSNs and diagnoses, are not viewable by other patients or unauthorized personnel.

Without further information about what the enterprise patient IDs looks like, it is hard to say for certain that this is not a violation of HIPAA, but at first blush it sounds acceptable, especially if this ID is not being printed on ID cards.

For more information:

This was first published in January 2010