A recent Adobe Reader zero-day exploit is notable for being the first in the wild to fully escape Reader's sandboxing...
capabilities. Could you explain how this attack works? Does it cast doubt on sandboxing as an effective enterprise application hardening technique?
Ask the Expert!
SearchSecurity expert Nick Lewis is standing by to answer your questions about enterprise security threats. Submit your question via email. (All questions are anonymous.)
A moat filled with sharknadoes is insufficient protection if it can be bypassed by a helicopter. There should be additional protections in place that will keep intruders out in case one defense fails. This is not to say there should be an infinite number of moats and flying sharks, but enterprises should evaluate the risk and the additional cost so the sharks with lasers aren't just protecting the public website.
The intent of the Adobe Reader and Acrobat sandbox is to make it significantly more difficult for attackers to exploit the software. An attacker must spend considerably more time and money developing exploits for Reader and Acrobat than was necessary a year or two ago. Clearly there's no such thing as a perfect defensive technology, but sandboxing by and large has made a difference in making software safer, and will surely continue to do so despite this minor setback.
Dig Deeper on Securing Productivity Applications
Related Q&A from Nick Lewis
Vonteera adware has the ability to disable antimalware software on endpoint devices. Expert Nick Lewis explains how enterprises can prevent this ...continue reading
ModPOS, a new POS malware, compromised millions of credit card accounts in 2015. Expert Nick Lewis explains how cybercriminals use this malware and ...continue reading
Amex cards have been discovered to be vulnerable to credit card hacking. Expert Nick Lewis explains how this happens, and what can be done about Chip...continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.