Researchers discovered an Intel chip flaw that can allow attackers to bypass ASLR protection and improve the effectiveness...
By submitting your personal information, you agree that TechTarget and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content, products and special offers.
of attacks on any platform. What exactly is the flaw and how does it result in attacks? What can enterprises do to prevent these attacks?
Address space layout randomization (ASLR) first appeared in computer operating systems in the early 2000s and was trumpeted as a major defense against buffer overflow attacks, a technique favored by hackers that can lead to arbitrary code execution and control hijacking. ASLR randomizes the memory locations used by system files and key program components, making it much harder for an attacker to correctly guess the location of a given process while substantially reducing the chances of a buffer overflow attack succeeding. ASLR-based defenses are widely adopted in all major operating systems, including those running on smartphones.
Being able to bypass ASLR memory protection can lead to complete control of a device. In a recent paper entitled "Jump Over ASLR: Attacking Branch Predictors to Bypass ASLR," researchers described a side-channel attack that could recover kernel address space layout randomization in about 60 milliseconds. The attack technique centers on Intel's use of the branch target buffer (BTB) in its Haswell chips. A circuit called a branch predictor, used by modern CPUs to improve the flow in the instruction pipeline, anticipates the addresses where soon-to-be-executed instructions are located. The predictor's BTB stores addresses from recently executed branch instructions so they can be obtained directly from a BTB lookup. As correct and incorrect predictions take slightly different amounts of time, this side-channel information can be used to identify the memory locations where specific chunks of code spawned by other software are loaded, as the BTB is shared by several applications executing on the same core.
The researchers said software countermeasures don't address the root cause of this side-channel, as it's the underlying hardware BTB addressing mechanism that requires fixing to prevent exploitable collisions in the BTB. While this attack is more efficient and direct than previous research into ways to bypass ASLR, it requires the attacker to be in a position to already run arbitrary code on the device. If an attacker can run arbitrary code on a system, they have far better options to subvert it than to bypass ASLR.
ASLR is not a perfect defense as implementations vary across operating systems and use different amounts of entropy, which affects the randomness of the address spaces and randomizing memory addresses at different intervals. Also, ASLR is an exploit mitigation technology aimed at protecting devices against remote attacks and not local attacks, which this particular attack is. Mitigation techniques against local attacks involve standard system hardening, such as removing unnecessary programs and accounts and setting up intrusion detection systems. This attack worked against the prediction hardware in Intel Haswell processors, but it's not known whether later Intel processors are also vulnerable. However, it does show that hardware and software play a role in keeping systems resilient from attack.
Find out how your enterprise can mitigate ASLR bypass flaws
Read about how the LevelDropper app malware gains system level privileges
Learn how to protect your Android device from Metaphor ASLR bypass attacks
Dig Deeper on Application attacks (buffer overflows, cross-site scripting)
Related Q&A from Michael Cobb
Geofencing technology is increasingly being used as a security tactic, such as to control access to servers with DNS settings. Expert Michael Cobb ...continue reading
After a remote code execution flaw in PHPMailer was patched, the problem persisted, and had to be repatched. Expert Michael Cobb explains how the ...continue reading
The same-origin security feature in Adobe Flash Player was implemented incorrectly, allowing local attackers to spy on users. Expert Michael Cobb ...continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.