The fact is that most banks take the security of their online services seriously, realizing correctly that a significant...
By submitting your personal information, you agree that TechTarget and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content, products and special offers.
percentage of customers are not going to use such services if the banks have a reputation for being unsafe. Banks also save a lot of money by offering online services, allowing them to afford security enhancements, such as the SiteKey implemented by Bank of America. Many smaller banks now offer similar authentication systems.
One of the biggest mistake banks have made is in not ensuring that enough people are Internet-savvy. Customers must recognize that the avoidable risks of online banking reside, namely, in email scams and phishing attacks.
Some banks, however, are making an effort to educate customers. At a small regional bank I visited recently, there is an interesting notice on the subject, readable by anyone who waits at the drive-thru. The notice lists the tell-tale signs of the major Internet scams, like a phony request for a deposit, overseas payment via Western Union and so on. I commend the bank on this educational initiative. Banks need to stop being nervous about the minimal risks customers face online, even though the threat does exist. Banks should be more proactive in educating their consumer base, because such scams undermine the benefits of online commerce for everyone, regardless of whether that risk is directly related to a bank's actions or not.
The other big mistake that financial service providers make is the failure to pressure email providers into implementing universally trusted email. The technology to do this has existed for at least five years, but petty proprietary wrangling among vendors has repeatedly killed efforts to implement simple email changes that would cut out most spam and phishing. Banks and other financial service providers need to realize that many risks of online activity could be removed almost overnight by responsible cooperation between the likes of Microsoft, Comcast, AOL, AT&T, Roadrunner, Yahoo and Google.
Bill Gates relied on hopelessly optimistic estimates by his analysts when, in January 2004, he said that spam would be solved within two years. In all its forms, including phishing, spam continues to inflict costs that arguably exceed $100 billion a year in the U.S. alone. But Gates was right when he said it could be solved. All we need is less greed, more collective corporate goodwill, and maybe some good old-fashioned bullying from financial service providers.
Dig Deeper on Two-factor and multifactor authentication strategies
Related Q&A from Michael Cobb
A technique known as the GhostHook attack can get around PatchGuard, but Microsoft hasn't patched the flaw. Expert Michael Cobb explains why, as well...continue reading
Software developed by the hacking group Platinum takes advantage of Intel AMT to bypass the built-in Windows firewall. Expert Michael Cobb explains ...continue reading
Tensions between the U.S. and Russia have led to source code reviews on security products, but the process isn't new. Expert Michael Cobb explains ...continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.