In other words, there isn't a best product. It depends on a corporation's specific needs.
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
But, that said, here's a quick rundown of some common products and what to look for when shopping around for a solution.
Far and away, the most common biometrics devices are still fingerprint scanners. Despite a lot of new products on the market, including some rather esoteric ones, fingerprint scanners remain the old standby. This is partly because they were one of the first biometric technologies invented and partly because of their ease of use.
But that doesn't mean fingerprint scanners should be the only consideration for a company's first biometrics implementation. There are also face and voice recognition systems and iris and retinal scanners, as well as new devices that "learn" typing patterns or identify electrophysiological signals.
Each has its own strengths and weaknesses. Fingerprint scanners have been around for a while and have a good track record. But they can be defeated, sometimes by a putty mold of a fingerprint, for example. They're also prone to errors. If a fingerprint is damaged from an injury or smudged, the reader might not work. Face and voice recognition systems suffer from some of the same issues -- they can be recorded, copied or spoofed. Iris and retinal scanners suffer from lack of customer acceptance. Who wants a light beam shining on their eye?
On the more esoteric side, BioPassword uses what they call keystroke dynamics to measure and record a user's typing speed and style. Aladdin is piloting a device that measures electrophysiological signals, which are a combination of heart rate and other cardiovascular metrics that can be read through a fingertip put on a reader.
Whichever route you choose, make sure there is a clear business case. Biometrics of all types requires an investment in hardware. If the data being protected is of low risk, biometrics is overkill. It should only be considered for access to highly sensitive data and high-value transactions. Otherwise, stick to more traditional authentication systems.
Make sure the devices are compatible with your network architecture. Biometrics has had a renaissance lately because the devices have gotten smaller; some are the size of key fobs and plug into USB ports.
The next consideration is the security of the device and its supporting systems. Data from biometrics devices is sensitive, like any other authentication credential. It should be gathered on a tamper-proof device, transmitted over an encrypted channel and stored in an encrypted database. Both Active Directory and LDAP offer these capabilities, and it's a best practice to check if the device is compliant with either of these authentication directory systems.
Then, of course, user acceptance is key. Whether for employees on the job or customers outside the company, if users don't want it, or think it's too difficult to use, consider something other than biometrics.
For more information:
Dig Deeper on Biometric Technology
Related Q&A from Joel Dubin
After a server room door has been compromised, finding a more secure solution is of utmost importance. Learn how to choose a server room door that ...continue reading
In the IAM world, what's the difference between access control and identity management. This IAM expert response explains how the two relate as well ...continue reading
When working with PeopleSoft and Unix, which single sign-on (SSO) vendors offer the most effective products? Learn how to choose an SSO product in ...continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.