Participants in the policy development process

Participants in the policy development process

What groups are normally involved in the policy development process?


    Requires Free Membership to View

    SearchSecurity.com members gain immediate and unlimited access to breaking industry news, virus alerts, new hacker threats, highly focused security newsletters, and more -- all at no cost. Join me on SearchSecurity.com today!

    Michael S. Mimoso, Editorial Director

    By submitting your registration information to SearchSecurity.com you agree to receive email communications from TechTarget and TechTarget partners. We encourage you to read our Privacy Policy which contains important disclosures about how we collect and use your registration and other information. If you reside outside of the United States, by submitting this registration information you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Your use of SearchSecurity.com is governed by our Terms of Use. You may contact us at webmaster@TechTarget.com.

Parties having knowledge and experience for the given policy or those the policy would have direct impact on. Most certainly, representatives from Legal, Human Resources, Audit, Systems and Computer Resource Management should always be involved. By obtaining buy-in early in the policy development life cycle, wasted time and resistance is decreased. I have always been a fan of appointing a user advocate. By having a "link" to the user community, acceptance for policies being implemented is greater, because users feel they do have input into the process and feel less alienated. The last feeling you want your user community to have is that their suggestions are being made to deaf ears. While in all probability, you will not be able to implement the request, the open communication will allow all parties to see the issues from another perspective.


This was first published in April 2001