Should a national cybersecurity strategy include offensive botnets?

Should a national cybersecurity strategy include offensive botnets?

Recently, some U.S. government officials called for offensive technology, even offensive botnets, in the interest of national cybersecurity strategy and defenses. Is that idea realistic, and what kinds of offensive cybersecurity tactics are the most logical and ethically acceptable?

    Requires Free Membership to View

    SearchSecurity.com members gain immediate and unlimited access to breaking industry news, virus alerts, new hacker threats, highly focused security newsletters, and more -- all at no cost. Join me on SearchSecurity.com today!

    Michael S. Mimoso, Editorial Director

    By submitting your registration information to SearchSecurity.com you agree to receive email communications from TechTarget and TechTarget partners. We encourage you to read our Privacy Policy which contains important disclosures about how we collect and use your registration and other information. If you reside outside of the United States, by submitting this registration information you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Your use of SearchSecurity.com is governed by our Terms of Use. You may contact us at webmaster@TechTarget.com.

Cane toads were introduced in Australia in 1935 in order to combat the cane beetle and preserve sugar cane crops. Unfortunately, the plan backfired, and cane toads are now more of a nuisance than cane beetles ever were. Offensive botnets are a similarly terrible idea.

Right now all industries, including the military, have very serious security problems. Recently the Department of Defense was infected with a USB virus, the Air Force traffic control system was breached, and attackers broke into the Joint Strike Fighter project network and stole terabytes of sensitive data. Information security is such a new and rapidly changing industry that there are no established, well-tested standards for creating secure infrastructures (as has been established with, say, building codes). Very few organizations have the resources required to launch organized, well-funded, constantly-monitored information security infrastructures. Even those that do still suffer security breaches.

The Internet is an environment no one controls or understands right now. Government entities -- even those that control very powerful tools -- are subject to the same information security problems as everyone else, and there are no easy solutions. To introduce a new, powerful, distributed weapon without the knowledge or resources to fully control it, would be foolish. An offensive botnet itself would be an especially coveted target for attackers. In the current environment, there is a high risk that any offensive cybersecurity technology would be compromised, misused or abused.

A national cybersecurity strategy would be more effectively improved if our government and critical industries were to consistently implement effective security practices, such as routine patching, monitoring and two-factor authentication. Most security breaches result from known flaws or weak account management, and can easily be prevented with careful, routine maintenance and attention. These remedies aren't as exciting as offensive botnets, but safety isn't supposed to be exciting.

This was first published in July 2009

Join the conversationComment

Share
Comments

    Results

    Contribute to the conversation

    All fields are required. Comments will appear at the bottom of the article.