By submitting your personal information, you agree that TechTarget and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content, products and special offers.
First, it's the neighborly thing to do. Blocking infected systems reduces the spread of malicious software on the Internet. Second, with fewer machines flooding the network with their wares, it conserves bandwidth, reducing costs for the ISP.
So why don't many ISPs do this? Quite simply, it can make customers angry. Many ISP customers expect unfettered access to the Internet, and they are not willing to tolerate "false positive" alerts that cause the temporary blocking of their systems while the matter is resolved.
There is a decent compromise that many ISPs adopt: notifying the owners of infected systems that they have security issue(s) on their network that require remediation. I would recommend this approach because it constitutes due diligence on the part of the ISP by informing the customer of the discovery without risking the client relationship due to an accidental disconnect.
Dig Deeper on DMZ Setup and Configuration
Related Q&A from Mike Chapple
A proposed cyberattack information database in the U.K. aims to improve cyberinsurance. Expert Mike Chapple explains what collecting data breach ...continue reading
The proposed CFTC regulations on cybersecurity testing are set to finalize in 2016. Expert Mike Chapple discusses the effects these regulations have ...continue reading
Whether Apple is a HIPAA covered entity was called into question when it advertised for a health regulations lawyer. Expert Mike Chapple discusses ...continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.