My advice to them? Don't obsess about it. There are some cases where you should be concerned about the physical...
security of your network, but at some point you're either going to have to trust an outside provider or run a cable through a secure area. In the case of this particular client, the risk seemed acceptable.
In the scenario you describe, an outside manhole shouldn't be a great concern. Once the traffic leaves your private network and enters the public Internet (which is of course where it goes once it leaves your building), none of the sensitive data should be sent without using encryption. Proper data encryption mitigates the risk of interception. There's no difference between someone climbing down a manhole and tapping your external connection and an eavesdropping hacker that compromises an intermediate router somewhere on the Internet.
Related Q&A from Mike Chapple, Enterprise Compliance
The HHS security risk assessment tool is designed to help healthcare providers meet the HIPAA security requirement. Expert Mike Chapple explains how ...continue reading
PCI DSS requirement 6.6 demands application security compliance through one of two options: an application firewall or a code review. Expert Mike ...continue reading
Are HIPAA-compliant hosting services a better option for compliance than a secure storage API? Expert Mike Chapple analyzes.continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.