My company has been evaluating network-based detection tools recently. In doing research, I came across a product...
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
that puts each Internet instance into its own virtual machine (VM) instead of even trying to detect malware and the like. What are your thoughts on such an approach? Do you think this would make for a more secure option?
Ask the Expert!
Have a question about network security for expert Brad Casey? Send them via email today! (All questions are anonymous
Placing each Internet instance into its own VM is definitely doable. In fact, the utilization of VMs to mitigate malware has become quite popular in recent years as it allows for the quick disposal and regeneration of an operating system without putting the host machine in any real danger. The concept you ask about is referred to as a micro-virtualization or a microVM. Each Internet task or process is automatically isolated in its own microVM; should a malware attack occur against that process, it is isolated in a way that doesn't allow damage to the rest of the system.
However, as promising as the microVM concept is, it is not a replacement for existing malware scanning methods. It may be true that when a microVM is used, any potential malware instance would be executed within the confines of the VM, but that doesn't mean that it would be permanently stuck there. While today I know of no documented case where malware in a microVM allowed any damage to the host, it is entirely possible that an attacker may eventually find a way to beat a microVM.
To that end, a word of caution: Virtualization is not a cure-all for combating malware. Many forms of malware actually have code that checks for the existence of a hypervisor, and if one is detected, the code deletes itself. Keep in mind that even though you are in a virtual environment, you're still operating within a network-connected device, and thereby not devoid of responsibility. Again, even without more specifics on your network infrastructure, along with any protective mechanisms you may have in place, I'm confident in saying that it's not wise to use microVMs in place of other malware-detection mechanisms -- at least not yet -- but there's no question that microVMs offer value as an additional layer of protection.
Dig Deeper on Network Intrusion Detection (IDS)
Related Q&A from Brad Casey
Our IT organization needs to secure customer names, but also needs to conduct searches on the entire customer database to match and merge records.continue reading
Don't treat physical and virtual machines' security differently. Since VM security issues threaten the whole infrastructure, here's how to stop ...continue reading
I have only seen companies deploy a NetBackup master server on a physical server. Are there any drawbacks to using a VM as a NetBackup master server?continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.