How do you overcome the disadvantages of proxy-based firewalls?
Proxy-based firewalls provide the most advanced firewall security technology currently available on the market. I use them myself and strongly recommend their use for protecting sensitive information, especially in public-facing Web applications.
Proxy firewalls function by acting as a true intermediary between the client and the server. Traditional stateful inspection firewalls simply analyze traffic to determine whether it should be allowed before passing it directly to the protected server. Proxy firewalls, on the other hand, actually establish connections with both the client and the server, allowing them to inject themselves into the connection stream. This provides them with the ability to perform deep application-layer inspection of traffic to identify application-level attacks, such as SQL injection exploits.
The main disadvantage to proxy-based firewalls is their cost. They are significantly more expensive than standard stateful inspection firewalls both in terms of actual financial cost and processing time used. The best way to compensate for this is to use the proxy features sparingly. If an application will not significantly benefit from proxy filtering, disable application filtering for that particular rule. This will help to squeeze maximum performance out of the firewall.
Related Q&A from Mike Chapple, Enterprise Compliance
The HHS security risk assessment tool is designed to help healthcare providers meet the HIPAA security requirement. Expert Mike Chapple explains how ...continue reading
PCI DSS requirement 6.6 demands application security compliance through one of two options: an application firewall or a code review. Expert Mike ...continue reading
Are HIPAA-compliant hosting services a better option for compliance than a secure storage API? Expert Mike Chapple analyzes.continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.