Installing patches without testing them |
 |
EXPERT RESPONSE FROM: Joel Johnson

|
 |
|
| > |
QUESTION POSED ON: 01 October 2002
Do you recommend installing patches without testing them first? I installed a patch for Windows NT 4.0 SP6 that resulted in disabling the session manager. There was no alternative but to return to the last backup image copy. Unfortunately, this was several patches back.
|
|
|
To continue reading for free, register below or login
To read more you must become a member of SearchSecurity.com
');
// -->

I would never recommend installing a patch without testing its effect on the environment in place. Having a QA environment that mirrors your live environment will always help ensure patches work correctly. I suggest convincing your management team to approve QA equipment to mirror your live equipment in order to properly test your patches and updates. If the uptime of your live equipment is important to company revenue this should be a worthwhile investment. Of course, nothing is 100% accurate so always make sure the patch is needed before installing.
For more information on this topic, visit these other SearchSecurity.com resources:
Featured Topic: Patchwork overload
Ask the Expert: Testing security patches
Best Web Links: Patches/patch management
|
|
|

|
|
 |

 |
 |
Search and Browse the Expert Answer Center
Search and browse more than 25,000 question and
answer pairs from more than 250 TechTarget industry experts.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |