Home > Ask the Security Experts > Application Security Questions & Answers > Should third-party software tools be used to customize applications?
Ask The Security Expert: Questions & Answers
EMAIL THIS

Should third-party software tools be used to customize applications?

Michael Cobb EXPERT RESPONSE FROM: Michael Cobb

Pose a Question
Other Security Categories
Meet all Security Experts
Become an Expert for this site


Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   


>
QUESTION POSED ON: 01 June 2007
I am an independent IT consultant/software developer, mostly providing application customization for clients, and I am very concerned about potential security issues for the products and services I want to provide. I am interested in expanding my business and accelerating my development time by using some third-party software, add-ins and other various components. What are the most important security best practices that can ensure that my third-party development tools do not expose myself or any of my clients to spyware or viruses.

>
EXPERT RESPONSE
When it comes to software development, I am a great believer in not reinventing the wheel. There is no point in spending weeks developing a feature if it is available on your chosen development platform as an add-in component. Many features and functions required for today's network-ready applications can be purchased at a fraction of the cost that it would take to build them independently. Many come with extensive support, and provide examples of how to integrate and use the various functions they provide.

But as you point out, how do you know that the components, particularly those downloaded from the Internet, do not contain malicious code that could destroy the integrity of your application? Many popular packages, such as Sendmail and OpenSSH, have been infected with malicious Trojans, and software distributions sites at the Free Software Foundation and SourceForge, for example, have also been successfully compromised in the past.

Firstly, I would be very cautious about using a component for which the source code was not available. Without the source code, you can never be sure of how the component works and what it does and doesn't do. If the source code can't be purchased as part of the component package, which can be the case with more complex components made by more established companies, I would strongly favor those that have been digitally signed. Software digital signatures show which publisher has provided the software package. They also verify that the package has not been tampered with since it was signed.

Code signing does not necessarily guarantee the quality or functionality of the software. Because software vendors' reputations are based on the quality of their code, however, there is an incentive for them to fix any problems. Before installing third-party packages, always check for a vendor's known vulnerabilities and then keep up with any patches and advisories. This will mean subscribing to its mailing list so that you are notified about any problems or issues. Also consider how to update and maintain your own product if one of its components needs urgent patching.

Many software products provide interfaces that enable third-party developers like you to integrate their software. Some vendors of such products, such as German software giant SAP, have set up integration certification programs to ensure the quality of products that interact with their own. If you are looking to develop such a product, I would recommend that you consider joining the relevant program. The program will provide a reference point for the integrity of your own work.

More information:

  • Use threat modeling to improve Web application security.
  • Should fuzzing be a part of the secure software development process? Michael Cobb explains.


  • Sound Off! -   Be the first to post a message to Sound Off!


    Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   


    RELATED CONTENT
    Application Security
    Protecting exposed servers from Google hacks (and Google 'dorks')
    Which automated quality assurance tools can be used to test software?
    Has proof-of-concept mobile device malware translated into any meaningful attacks?
    How to test the security of personal details submitted to a website
    Is security improved when the number of Internet gateways is reduced?
    Are Internet cafe users' email credentials at risk?
    Which operating system can best secure an FTP site?
    Will firewall technology have to adapt to applications that use port 80?
    How secure is a mobile phone platform that has an open source framework?
    What ports should be opened and closed when IPsec filters are implemented?

    Secure Software Development
    Software still plagued with security holes, researcher says
    Microsoft tools won't be quick fix for SQL injection attacks
    Which automated quality assurance tools can be used to test software?
    Gary McGraw on secure software development
    Product review: Mu-4000 Security Analyzer
    Product review: Klocwork Insight 8.0
    HP aims at IBM with application vulnerability scanning as service
    Information security book excerpts and reviews
    7 Security Questions to Ask Your SaaS Provider
    Product review: CodeArmor 2.2 for Microsoft .NET

    Web Application Security (Also see Web Access Control)
    Microsoft tools won't be quick fix for SQL injection attacks
    New defenses for automated SQL injection attacks
    HP aims at IBM with application vulnerability scanning as service
    Information security book excerpts and reviews
    Kaminsky on DNS rebinding attacks, hacking techniques
    Webmail security: Best practices for data protection
    Tracing malware's steps with RE:Trace
    SQL injection attack infects hundreds of thousands of websites
    PCI Council issues clarification on Web application security
    Web security gateways keep Web-based malware at bay

    RELATED GLOSSARY TERMS
    Terms from Whatis.com − the technology online dictionary
    bypass  (SearchSecurity.com)
    Common Weakness Enumeration  (SearchSecurity.com)
    debugging  (SearchSoftwareQuality.com)
    fuzz testing  (SearchSecurity.com)
    heuristics  (SearchSoftwareQuality.com)
    sandbox  (SearchSecurity.com)
    threat modeling  (SearchSecurity.com)
    trigraph  (SearchSecurity.com)

    RELATED RESOURCES
    2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems
    Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts
    Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary



    Search and Browse the Expert Answer Center
    Search and browse more than 25,000 question and answer pairs from more than 250 TechTarget industry experts.
    Browse our Expert Advice

    TechTarget Security Media
    Information Security View this month\\'s issue and subscribe today.
    Information Security Decisions Apply online for free conference admission.
    SearchSecurity.com
    HomeNewsMagazineWebcastsWhite PapersLearningAdviceTopicsEventsAbout Us

    About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
    TechTarget provides enterprise IT professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective IT purchase decisions and managing their organizations' IT projects - with its network of technology-specific Web sites, events and magazines.

    TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Reprints  |  Site Map




    All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2003 - 2008, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
      TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts