Home > Ask the Security Experts > Platform Security Questions & Answers > Examining DoD-level secure erasure guidelines
Ask The Security Expert: Questions & Answers
EMAIL THIS

Examining DoD-level secure erasure guidelines

Michael Cobb EXPERT RESPONSE FROM: Michael Cobb

Pose a Question
Other Security Categories
Meet all Security Experts
Become an Expert for this site


Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   


>
QUESTION POSED ON: 02 August 2007
We hear a lot about DoD-level secure erasure guidelines. Are there multiple levels? Does it simply mean overwrite existing data three times with random data? Where is the standard documented, and where can I get more information on the standard? Is secure erasure a doable procedure?

>
EXPERT RESPONSE
When addressing DoD-level secure erasure, some products claim to remove data according to the DoD 5220.22-M standard, referring to the U.S. Department of Defense's National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual, DoD 5220.22-M. The manual addresses how to prevent unauthorized disclosure of classified information, covering data clearing and sanitization in two short paragraphs. The guide, however, doesn't actually specify any particular method for achieving secure erasure, so in no way is the manual a standard.

The guide, however, does say that "instructions on clearing, sanitization and release of IS media shall be issued by the accrediting CSA." Standards for sanitization are left up to the Cognizant Security Agency, which can be the Department of Defense (DoD), the Department of Energy (DOE), the Natural Resources Commission (NRC) and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

The DOE, for one, has issued Media Clearing, Purging and Destruction Guidance as part of the Cyber Security Program. A more practical document is the DoD's Clearing and Sanitization Matrix from the Defense Security Service.This guide, in particular, does specify methods and procedures for destroying classified media and equipment. I would also recommend the NIST Special Publication 800-88, Guidelines for Media Sanitization. Its recommendations can be applied to all types of organizations and will help you devise an appropriate erasure policy based on the level of your information's confidentiality.

So what level of erasure should you set for your confidential data? When vendors state that their products meet the "DoD 5220.22-M standard," it generally means that the tool will write to all addressable hard drive locations with a character, its complement, then a random character, followed by verification. The procedure is completed three times and prevents data from being recovered by commercially available processes.

Interestingly in the fall of 2004, the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA Advisory LAA-006-2004) found that a single overwrite using the above process is sufficient to render electronic files unrecoverable. One problem with software disk-wiping is that it cannot sanitize disconnected or forgotten internal hard drives, or hard drives that have actually physically failed.

Therefore if your drives are not required again, you could look at destroying them by degaussing, melting, incineration, crushing or shredding. Physical destruction offers the highest level of erasure, but even this tactic is not necessary absolute, especially if any remaining disk pieces are larger than a single 512-byte record block.

Whichever method you chose, either software wiping or physical destruction, you must put policies in place that govern hard drive disposal. Also, employee training should ensure that you have taken "reasonable measures" to safeguard your data. The FTC's Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA) rule governs the proper storage and disposal of certain consumer information and requires that such information is properly disposed of. Although physically destroying disks is more costly than wiping them, the potential costs associated with compromised data may make it the best option.

More information:

  • Learn the pros and cons of data wiping.
  • Get smart about data leak prevention.


  • Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   


    RELATED CONTENT
    Platform Security
    How can 'DRAM remanence' compromise encryption keys?
    Should users have a removable boot drive for online banking?
    The unexpected costs of server virtualization?
    Is attack code valuable for vulnerabilities or just a publicity stunt?
    Will the features of Windows Vista SP1 encourage wider adoption of the OS?
    Is a Master Boot Record (MBR) rootkit completely invisible to the OS?
    What are the pros and cons of zero-knowledge penetration tests?
    Are open recursive DNS servers inherently insecure?
    Should whole disk encryption products be used with data backup software?
    Which operating system can best secure an FTP site?

    Data Backup
    Should users have a removable boot drive for online banking?
    Should whole disk encryption products be used with data backup software?
    Will one failed drive corrupt the rest of a RAID-5 array?
    The Craft of System Security
    Can confidential data be accessed once it is deleted for free space?
    What is the relationship between open port range and overall security risk?
    Compliance, data breaches heighten database security needs
    Are encryption products better than self-destructing data?
    What is a logic bomb?
    What should be done with a RAID-5 array's failed drives?

    Enterprise Data Protection
    Sophos to acquire mobile data protection company Utimaco
    Should users have a removable boot drive for online banking?
    Unified communications trigger data leakage dangers, survey finds
    NitroSecurity covers its bases with RippleTech deal
    Easing e-discovery preparation by mapping enterprise data
    Quiz:: E-discovery and security in the enterprise
    Growing Mac use prompts call for better security
    Web 2.0 and e-discovery: Risks and countermeasures
    Screencast: Recovering lost data with WinHex
    Countermeasures against targeted attacks in the enterprise

    RELATED GLOSSARY TERMS
    Terms from Whatis.com − the technology online dictionary
    cut-and-paste attack  (SearchSecurity.com)
    data splitting  (SearchSecurity.com)
    deperimeterization  (SearchSecurity.com)
    Google hacking  (SearchSecurity.com)
    masquerade  (SearchSecurity.com)
    snooping  (SearchSecurity.com)

    RELATED RESOURCES
    2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems
    Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts
    Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary



    Search and Browse the Expert Answer Center
    Search and browse more than 25,000 question and answer pairs from more than 250 TechTarget industry experts.
    Browse our Expert Advice



    Find Security Solutions for Your Business
    Targeted Security Channel Tips for Resellers, Integrators and Consultants
    TechTarget Security Media
    Information Security View this month\\'s issue and subscribe today.
    Information Security Decisions Apply online for free conference admission.
    SearchSecurity.com
    HomeNewsMagazineMultimediaWhite PapersLearningAdviceTopicsEventsAbout Us

    About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
    TechTarget provides enterprise IT professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective IT purchase decisions and managing their organizations' IT projects - with its network of technology-specific Web sites, events and magazines.

    TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Reprints  |  Site Map




    All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2003 - 2008, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
      TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts