Home > Ask the Security Experts > Application Security Questions & Answers > Are message stubs a secure part of email retention policies?
Ask The Security Expert: Questions & Answers
EMAIL THIS

Are message stubs a secure part of email retention policies?

Michael Cobb, featured expert EXPERT RESPONSE FROM: Michael Cobb, featured expert

Pose a Question
Other Security Categories
Meet all Security Experts
Become an Expert for this site


Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   


>
QUESTION POSED ON: 29 January 2009
I've read about "stubbing," a common feature in email archiving applications that involves transferring an email from a user's mailboxes to a new location, while replacing the original email in the user mailbox with a small message "stub" pointing to the new location of the email. Does this mechanism create any security limitations?

>
To manage the ever-growing number of messages travelling in and out of an organization's email boxes, organizations have to balance performance and productivity against security and legal requirements. Deleting older emails is not an option for many companies, because it may well violate various laws and regulations covering email correspondence.

In essence, stubbing is an archiving mechanism where attachments and the body of an email are stripped from the message. The email application retains only the header and a stub file, or link within the message. The actual message and attachment are stored in a separate archive. In GroupWise, a Novell Inc. software product that offers email, for example, the user database stores the message header information, and the message database holds the messages' content and small attachments. Larger attachments are stored as binary large objects (BLOBs) in a directory. Removing storage-intensive attachments means a much smaller message store. This improves overall system performance and allows administrators to more efficiently manage backups and scheduled maintenance while keeping the entire message accessible to the end-users.

A recent Microsoft white paper on email security recommended that large-enterprise Exchange users provide larger email boxes while moving old emails to a third-party email archiving product. The company's argument is that the volume and size of email continues to increase daily, and end users who have to spend time everyday trying to manage a mailbox with a low maximum volume are not going to be productive. Also, people will try to circumvent restrictions leading to further problems. Over time, an email inbox can get quite large, with tens of thousands of emails. And if you're not allowed to delete any of them, such a large number messages –- even if they're just stubs –- can quickly become unmanageable. And, of course, since a stub file has little information in it -- sometimes only a message header –- trying to find an old message becomes almost impossible.

But stubbing or email archiving means that you now have extra storage locations that need securing and protecting. Also, electronic documents must be stored in a format that does not change the information. Encryption is allowed and obviously recommended, but any stubbing must not remove or lose information about points of origin, destinations, dates and times. The 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act, for example, stipulates that companies must save all documentation used to create financial reports and audits. The document-retention period is seven years, and recovery time is limited to a few days following a federal request. The SEC has expanded Rule 17a to now require that exchange member and brokerage house record keeping include all forms of internal and external electronic communication, such as emails.

Because of the legal importance of such emails, Write-Once-Read-Many (WORM) magnetic disk storage should be used with any email archiving system. WORM also has the added advantage of faster response times than tape or optical disk. Storage risk assessment is vital to the security and protection of such valuable company information. A secondary, geographically separated data center should be considered. Smaller email systems may well benefit from taking a stubbing approach, although medium-sized and large enterprise systems will probably do better with a pure archiving implementation.

More information:

  • Learn strategies for email archiving and meeting compliance regulations.
  • In our Messaging Security School, learn about email security tools, systems and threats.


  • BROWSE BY TAG
    Application Security,   Application and Platform Security,   Email Protection,   Email Security Guidelines, Encryption and Appliances,   VIEW ALL TAGS

    Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   



    RELATED CONTENT
    Application Security
    Do Facebook URL security concerns justify blocking social networks?
    Is there a way to block iPhone widgets that bypass Web filters?
    Should enterprises be concerned with Twitter in the workplace?
    Are there still Google Desktop security problems?
    Can an IP spoofing tool be used to spam SPF servers?
    Will an application usage policy best control network bandwidth?
    How can URL-shortening services be manipulated?
    Is my security program ready for Web application firewall deployment?
    How to ensure the security of a shopping cart application
    When to use the service features of the Metasploit hacking tool

    Email Security Guidelines, Encryption and Appliances
    How to confirm the receipt of an email with security protocols
    Best Email Security Products
    Can an IP spoofing tool be used to spam SPF servers?
    WatchGuard acquires email and Web security vendor BorderWare
    McAfee to acquire email SaaS vendor MX Logic
    What does 'invoked by uid 78' mean?
    How to configure firewall ports for webmail system implementation
    Fierce competition prompted new Cisco email security options
    Cisco brings email security appliances closer to SaaS
    Cisco offers more email security choices, but lacks vision

    RELATED GLOSSARY TERMS
    Terms from Whatis.com − the technology online dictionary
    asymmetric cryptography  (SearchSecurity.com)
    challenge-response system  (SearchSecurity.com)
    cryptographic checksum  (SearchSecurity.com)
    data encryption/decryption IC  (SearchSecurity.com)
    elliptical curve cryptography  (SearchSecurity.com)
    Escrowed Encryption Standard  (SearchSecurity.com)
    MPPE  (SearchSecurity.com)
    Quiz: Cryptography  (SearchSecurity.com)
    session key  (SearchSecurity.com)
    Twofish  (SearchSecurity.com)

    RELATED RESOURCES
    2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems
    Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts
    Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary



    Search and Browse the Expert Answer Center
    Search and browse more than 25,000 question and answer pairs from more than 250 TechTarget industry experts.
    Browse our Expert Advice



    Find Security Solutions for Your Business
    TechTarget Security Media
    Information Security View this month\\'s issue and subscribe today.
    Information Security Decisions Apply online for free conference admission.
    SearchSecurity.com
    HomeNewsMagazineMultimediaWhite PapersLearningAdviceTopicsEventsAbout Us

    About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
    TechTarget provides technology professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective purchase decisions and managing their organizations' technology projects - with its network of technology-specific websites, events and online magazines.

    TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Site Map




    All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2003 - 2009, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
      TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts