Access your Pro+ Content below.
2009 Information Security magazine Readers' Choice Awards
This article is part of the September 2009 issue of Information Security magazine
For the fourth consecutive year, Information Security and SearchSecurity.com readers voted to determine the market's best security products. A record 1721 voters participated in the 2009 Readers' Choice Awards, rating 380 products and services in 17 different categories. Respondents were asked to rate each product based on criteria specific to each category. For each criteria, respondents scored the product on a scale of one (poor) to five (excellent). In addition, each criteria was given a weighted percentage to reflect its importance in that category. Winners were based on the cumulative weighted responses for each product category criteria. Editors arrived at a product's overall score by calculating the average score it received for each criteria, applying the weighted percentage and adding the adjusted scores. 2009 READERS' CHOICE AWARDS WINNERS Introduction and Methodology Best Antimalware Products Readers vote on the best business-grade desktop and server antivirus and antispyware products. Best Application Security ...
Features in this issue
For the fourth consecutive year, Information Security readers voted to determine the best security products. A record 1721 voters participated this year, rating products in 17 different categories.
The demonstration of a hacking tool at Black Hat that allows attackers to escape from virtual machines to attack their guest OS elevates the seriousness of security threats to virtualization.
Encryption solves some very straight-forward problems but implementation isn't always easy. We'll explain some of the common misperceptions so you'll understand your options.
Columns in this issue
Accountability for Internet security should be placed on users, not service providers such as hotels.
Security experts Bruce Schneier and Marcus Ranum debate whether perfect access control is possible.
Passing an audit can lull an organization into a false sense of security.