Premium Content

Access "Layer 8: SOX security spending is an old, wrinkled tactic"

Published: 15 Oct 2012

Those who have used the law to justify their infosecurity projects must answer for their spending. I recall a college philosophy course that had us wrestle with the question, "Does it pay to be ethical?" Perhaps a more current rephrasing of the inquiry would be, "Does it pay to be SOX-compliant?" The answer depends on not just ethical considerations, but also political and economic factors. If the sole purpose of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act is to prevent another Enron/Tyco/WorldCom debacle, then everything being asked of IT is a waste of time. If SOX is purely a political measure designed to ensure the re-election of congressmen, then it's obviously a waste of IT's budget. But if the purpose of SOX is to improve revenue for the auditing firms, then it has been a resounding success. The last several centuries of capitalism demonstrate that an independently verified level of transparency and governance is beneficial to investors and other stakeholders. Although national legislation and enforcement is a messy and imprecise instrument, there doesn't seem to be any ... Access >>>

Access TechTarget
Premium Content for Free.

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

What's Inside

Features

More Premium Content Accessible For Free