Access your Pro+ Content below.
Determining the value of infosec certifications
This article is part of the October 2011 issue of Information Security magazine
Certifications and certification bodies have played a prominent and controversial role in the development of the information security profession. Attaining certifications has been viewed as a common method to create a personal brand of credibility and knowledge. For many, the effective leveraging of this brand has led to the establishment and the advancement of their information security career. This impact has not gone unnoticed, and the certification industry has become a lucrative business. Certification and educational bodies that offer training have been able to capitalize by developing a large number of programs that appeal to every segment of the profession. If you include all of the encompassing information security certification programs (i.e. CISSP, CISM, etc), the 24 SANS GIAC certifications programs, and vendor-based certifications (i.e. RSA, Symantec, etc), there are more than 50 options. It can be argued no organization has been more effective in marketing certifications than ISC(2), and its CISSP; as of ...
Access this PRO+ Content for Free!
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
Features in this issue
Hear from the winners of this year's Information Security magazine Security 7 Award.
Traditional antivirus tools have matured into multi-featured antimalware suites. Here’s what you should know when shopping for endpoint protection.
The breaches of certificate authorities fuel renewed debate for Internet security alternatives.
Columns in this issue
This year’s Security 7 Award winners represent a bright spot in an industry beset by bad news.
An InfoSec Leaders survey examines the impact of different certs on the security profession.
Networked medical devices introduce new risks but does a new standard go far enough in addressing the problem?