This tip is excerpted from Outsourcing Information Security, written by C. Warren Axelrod and published by Artech House Publishers. Download Chapter 4, Risks of Outsourcing or learn more about the book.
One of the main reasons to outsource is the expectation of receiving better service from the outsourcer than from internal staff. This expectation is often based on the knowledge that there will be an explicit SLA in place, which can be enforced by the customer and which might bear remedies against the outsourcer for nonperformance. While companies are increasingly establishing SLAs for internal providers, they are often harder to enforce since everyone is a member of the family.
If an outsourcer loses a customer because of poor service, it is much less excusable. Of course, the perception of poor service could be misguided, or service expectations may not have been realistic in the first place. However, SLAs between customer and provider generally specify what constitutes acceptable service and what does not. Therefore, a base set of metrics exists against which to measure performance. The SLA is discussed in greater detail in Chapter 6.
There is a strong argument that the measures in an SLA may not adequately depict the perceived service. In an article by Jiang et al., quality measures are categorized into tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance and empathy items [5]. Some items are typical of those included in a SLA, whereas others are not. The quality measures include the following categories.
Tangibles
In tangibles:
Reliability
In reliability:
Responsiveness
In responsiveness:
Assurance
In assurance:
Empathy
In empathy:
09 Mar 2005