Home > Information Security Magazine > Features > Invasion Force
EMAIL THIS LICENSING & REPRINTS
Information Security Magazine

  CURRENT ISSUE  

  FEATURES  

  COLUMNS  

  HOT PICK & PRODUCT REVIEWS  

  ARCHIVES  

  SUBSCRIBE/RENEW  
 

Invasion Force
by David Dittrich
Issue: Mar 2005
printer-friendly
licensing & reprints
< PREV PAGE   |   1  |   2  |   NEXT PAGE  >
EXPOSE
Botnets are sweeping across the digital frontier. Prepare to repel the horde.

Evolution: Rise of the Bots

Channel Wars
Bots were created in the early 1990s by IRC users who wanted to protect and defend against "net split" attacks, among other tasks. While attackers were using bots to knock IRC users out of their favorite channels and deny them access to their user names, the users fought back with their own bots to preserve the integrity of user names and to keep channel access open.

Open Floodgates
By 1999, an arsenal of nascent DDoS tools had emerged: Trinoo, Tribe Flood Network, Stacheldraht and Shaft. These tools, which were used to launch attacks against IRC hosts, were only semi-automatic, required significant manual tuning, and didn't use IRC for communications. Canadian hacker MafiaBoy used these types of tools in his 2000 attacks that brought down Yahoo!, eBay, CNN and Amazon.com Web sites.

Automated Animation
In 2000, the need for automation and larger compromised networks led bot developers to merge their DDoS tools with worms and Trojan kits. For example, Stacheldraht was bundled with versions of the t0rnkit rootkit and a variant of the Ramen worm, and the Lion worm included the TFN2K agent. This convergence enabled attackers to compromise vast numbers of machines faster.

Command & Control
By 2002, DDoS attackers transitioned to IRC-controlled bots that implemented with greater efficiency the same attacks as Stacheldraht. Since many attackers were familiar with IRC and bot programming, it made sense to stick with IRC-based DDoS bots. Today, the majority of DDoS tools use IRC as a communication protocol and means of control (even if not directly using IRC networks as control channels).

Dangerous Convergence
Since 2003, bot creators have focused on truly blended threats--malware, spam, spyware, DDoS--that use IRC channels as control mechanisms. Modern bots, such as Phatbot and Agobot, use viruses and worms to build networks of hundreds of thousands of machines. The 2004 Witty worm was launched simultaneously without warning from 4,200 points, making it nearly impossible to trace.

Botnets, vast armies of compromised, robot-like machines, are massing on the digital frontier, waiting for their masters' command to attack.

These hacker-controlled networks--some numbering in the hundreds of thousands of machines--are the fastest-growing menaces on the Internet. They have powerful weapons--overwhelming DDoS attacks, untraceable spam relays and ubiquitous malware distribution. When unleashed, they deliver punishing blows that devastate their targets.

Hackers, malware writers and organized crime groups love bots--the foot-soldier programs infecting PC networks--for their power and cloaking abilities. Some bots, such as Agobot and Phatbot, have characteristics similar to Trojans and rootkits, opening backdoors to systems and giving attackers control over compromised machines. Attackers only require rudimentary programming knowledge to create and control a botnet army.

Botnet commanders can start with just a handful of compromised computers that are mustered manually by sending targeted, virus-laden e-mails to broadband/ DSL users, vulnerable enterprise desktops and mobile machines. Some bot-carrying worms will even patch the vulnerability they exploited. Infected hosts automatically show up in a preprogrammed IRC channel, where they sit in a virtual holding pattern until dispatched. Attackers can "herd" their bots from channel to channel, sifting out the low-bandwidth connections to maximize the machines with the best throughput.

Their ubiquity, power and ease of use make them looming threats on both sides of the enterprise firewall. Understanding botnets will help enterprises defend against in-filtration and, perhaps, survive an invasion.

Multipronged Attack
Enterprises face botnet threats on two fronts: Attackers are trying to compromise their machines and use them for malicious purposes (a breach of integrity) or coordinated attacks such as DDoS (risk of downstream liability).

Once the computer is compromised, bots need to "phone home" to their controller. Generally, this is done through a private channel on a public IRC server or network, with communications running in the clear over the default TCP port 6667. (A prudent botnet defense is blocking and monitoring outbound TCP 6667 traffic.) Also, attackers can use IRC protocols to communicate instructions to their bots.

Attackers can use the bots and their hosts for a variety of purposes, some seemingly innocuous to the compromised enterprise. For in-stance, botnets have become the distribution method of choice for spam and phishing attacks. According to e-mail security service provider MessageLabs, nearly 70 percent of all spam and phishing e-mails now originate from botnets. Tracing these attacks is difficult due to the many layers between the source machines and the attacker.

Botnets are the ideal mechanism for unleashing malware. Conven-tional worms are released from a single point and can take hours to circle the globe. Worms released from botnets can appear from multiple points simultaneously without warning, giving enterprises and AV vendors little time to react. Last spring's lightning-quick Witty worm was launched from a relatively small botnet of 4,200 nodes.

The more visible and devastating attack type is the DDoS attack. More than just simple SYN floods, botnet-controlled DDoS attacks can flood a network with seemingly legitimate requests, clogging the pipes, overloading services and denying all legitimate traffic. A moderate-sized botnet could completely disable Web, mail and VoIP communications; a DDoS attack directed at your DNS server could make your enterprise disappear from the Internet.

Your enterprise will most likely become aware of a botnet infiltration through user reports of performance issues; third-party reports of attacks originating in your IP address space; victims' reports of DDoS floods; and the detection of high inbound and outbound scanning, outbound flooding or traffic passing through hosts that should be acting like desktop clients.

To stay ahead of botnets, you need stay current with prevention tools and techniques (e.g., proactive vulnerability scanning, patch management, appropriate use of firewalls and VPNs, user education, and policy enforcement). You also need to have sufficient computer forensics and incident response capabilities to adequately deal with compromises when they occur, and to return compromised machines to a trusted state as quickly as possible.
< PREV PAGE   |   1  |   2  |   NEXT PAGE  >





TechTarget Security Media
Information Security View this month\\'s issue and subscribe today.
Information Security Decisions Apply online for free conference admission.
SearchSecurity.com
HomeNewsMagazineWebcastsWhite PapersLearningAdviceTopicsEventsAbout Us

About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
TechTarget provides enterprise IT professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective IT purchase decisions and managing their organizations' IT projects - with its network of technology-specific Web sites, events and magazines.

TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Reprints  |  Site Map




All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2003 - 2008, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
  TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts