Home > Information Security Magazine > Hot Pick & Product Reviews > Product review: AirDefense Enterprise 7.3
EMAIL THIS
Information Security Magazine

  CURRENT ISSUE  

  FEATURES  

  COLUMNS  

  HOT PICK & PRODUCT REVIEWS  

  ARCHIVES  

  SUBSCRIBE/RENEW  
 

Product review: AirDefense Enterprise 7.3
Issue: Sep 2008
printer-friendly
< PREV PAGE   |   1  |   2  |   NEXT PAGE  >

[TABLE]
The appliance is initialized via command line interface for basic network configuration. When you attach to the appliance through a browser the first time, AirDefense installs its thin client enterprise GUI on Linux or Windows-based workstations.

For our test, we opted for the Startup Wizard, which led us through system settings, network structure, creating user accounts, defining policies, configuring alarms, automated event classifications, notifications and identifying access points. This was the easiest method of deployment, as the overall documentation for the server and administrator were thin and redundant. You can also restore a previously saved configuration (perfect for distributed enterprise deployments) or go directly to the dashboard for a manual configuration.

Overall, administration is much easier, than the last version we reviewed especially for large, distributed deployments, thanks to the division of labor into distinct roles. We created administrators, who are able to manage all aspects of configuration and management; managers who can do everything an administrator can



except for editing logs and adding users; network operators who deal specifically with network operations including alerts and alarms, and a guest account with limited manager and network operator functions.

Furthermore, administration roles can be limited through domain-based partitioning which restricts access to different networks, groups and devices. We assigned our partitioning to logical networks; however, it's easy to see how enterprises, such as retail organizations with multiple locations, divisions and business units could take advantage of this feature.

Users can be authenticated locally through the AirDefense server or through remote RADIUS or LDAP servers.

Sensor placement depends on what type of protection is required. Sensor density is lower for rogue detection and policy enforcement than for connection termination. Location tracking and the newest feature, WEP cloaking, both require more sensors per square feet.

The sensors are a huge improvement over previous hardware, as the version we tested solely utilizes PoE and requires no additional power supply.

< PREV PAGE   |   1  |   2  |   NEXT PAGE  >





TechTarget Security Media
Information Security View this month\\'s issue and subscribe today.
Information Security Decisions Apply online for free conference admission.
SearchSecurity.com
HomeNewsMagazineMultimediaWhite PapersLearningAdviceTopicsEventsAbout Us

About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
TechTarget provides technology professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective purchase decisions and managing their organizations' technology projects - with its network of technology-specific websites, events and online magazines.

TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Site Map




All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2003 - 2009, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
  TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts