One of the hackers who claimed to have found a new remotely exploitable JavaScript vulnerability in the popular Firefox browser has now said that claim was a joke and that no such flaw exists.
Mischa Spiegelmock, one of two hackers who gave a presentation last weekend on Firefox flaws at a small security conference called ToorCon, has told security officials with the Mozilla Foundation that the vulnerability he discussed cannot be used to execute arbitrary code. Instead, the flaw can only be used to cause the browser to crash and consume large amounts of system resources.
In their presentation at the conference in San Diego, Spiegelmock and Andrew Wbeelsoi said they had discovered a previously unknown hole in Firefox's JavaScript implementation, which could allow a remote attacker to run code on a target machine. Window Snyder, who heads up Mozilla's security efforts, acknowledged at the time that there did seem to be a legitimate problem with the implementation. However, after looking at the code that the two hackers gave Mozilla, Snyder posted a message on the Mozilla Developer Center site Monday saying that the problem is not as serious as Spiegelmock and Wbeelsoi claimed. Her post included a statement from Spiegelmock about the vulnerability and his presentation at ToorCon:
"The main purpose of our talk was to be humorous. As part of
Requires Free Membership to View
SearchSecurity.com members gain immediate and unlimited access to breaking industry news, virus alerts, new hacker threats, highly focused security newsletters, and more -- all at no cost. Join me on SearchSecurity.com today!
Michael S. Mimoso, Editorial DirectorIn her post, Snyder acknowledged that the vulnerability the pair discussed can in fact be used to cause Firefox to crash, and said that Mozilla engineers are continuing to analyze it. The flaw was considered significant enough that both US-CERT and The SANS Institute's Internet Storm Center posted notices about it.
Security Management Strategies for the CIO
Join the conversationComment
Share
Comments
Results
Contribute to the conversation