While the Nachi worm have been described by some as an antidote to the Lovsan worm, it comes with some nasty side...
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
effects such as clogging local networks with trash traffic.
Nachi, also known as the Welchia worm, emerged on Monday. It targets the same RPC vulnerability that allowed Lovsan to infect more than one million computers last week. However, Nachi then tries to kill Lovsan on infected systems and downloads a patch from Microsoft to prevent against future infection.
Also, it has emerged that Nachi also targets the Windows WebDav vulnerability, which was discovered in March when it was exploited on a Web site run by the US Army. The vulnerability is deep within Windows but can be exploited on Windows 2000 machines running IIS 5.0. The vulnerability is also found in Windows XP and NT 4.0 but it's not believed that Nachi can exploit the flaw on those platforms.
In a way, Nachi is probably a week too late. Many systems susceptible to the vulnerability have probably been patched, else Lovsan would have infected them. But experts agree that getting hit by a purported benevolent worm to protect against bad ones is not a good security plan.
Nachi doesn't do a great job removing Lovsan. It does stop the Lovsan process and delete the file associated with it. It also goes out and downloads the RPC patch and installs that. But the worm doesn't remove the registry key dropped by Lovsan. Moreover, having a worm install a patch is not an advisable practice.
The worm can cause a lot of problems because of the spike in Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) traffic on local network. The worm produces that traffic when it tries to verify a system is vulnerable. That extra traffic can choke out local usage of networks.
There are other more minor problems associated with Nachi. It may install a patch wrong or it may reboot a system after patching, said Mikko Hypponen, manager of antivirus research for F-Secure of Finland.
At first, some antivirus companies called Nachi a variant of Lovsan but that is not the case, said Dan Ingevaldson, engineering director for Internet Security Systems Inc.'s X-Force security monitoring operation. In a way, Nachi is written better than Lovsan. Instead of using separate exploit offsets for Windows 2000 and XP like Lovsan, Nachi has one. The benefit of such an approach is it doesn't crash systems as much. Lovsan took some systems down when it used the wrong offset on a machine.
FOR MORE INFORMATION: