Deploying a network security combination of different best-of-breed products takes far longer and is more expensive...
By submitting your personal information, you agree that TechTarget and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content, products and special offers.
to implement than an integrated solution with similar capabilities, according to a report from The Tolly Group.
Testing multiple solutions in a lab environment designed to simulate a medium-sized enterprise revealed that choosing a variety of best-of-breed products and integrating them -- a common practice in many areas of IT -- "may not be the best option when it comes to security," said Charles Bruno, executive editor at Boca Raton, Fla.-based The Tolly Group.
"Going into it, we anticipated a level of complexity," Bruno said. "What we found was the difference in the time it took to deploy the different solutions was striking."
The Tolly Group looked at a solution comprised of Juniper Networks/NetScreen and Check Point Software Technologies solutions, as well as an integrated offering from Astaro Security Linux. The Juniper and Check Point products were augmented with Trend Micro antivirus and Websense URL-blocking tools.
All told, the report estimates that the Astaro offering would take 72 hours to install and support during the first year of operation, while the Juniper/NetScreen option would require 139 hours and the Check Point option 184 hours. The integrated solution was also faster when it came to defining server and host entries and on monthly backup of the system configuration.
That time translates to cost, Bruno said, and adds up to a "penalty" during the first year of deployment. "Network admins are still going to have to decide whether a best-of-breed option is right for them," he added.
Jim Hurley, VP at Boston-based Aberdeen Group, said security professionals often prefer best-of-breed offerings, despite the added work of integration. However, the waves of consolidation that have hit the security industry have produced more all-in-one solutions that are being looked at more closely.
The test simulated a 1,200-person company with three satellite offices running VPNs, firewalls, antispam, antivirus and URL filtering tools. Bruno said the study may hold a lesson for larger enterprises "We've shown that in this case at least, an integrated solution can save a lot of time," he said.