Report: Integrated security approach saves money

Article

Report: Integrated security approach saves money

Keith Regan, Contributing Writer

Deploying a network security combination of different best-of-breed products takes far longer and is more expensive to implement than an integrated solution with similar capabilities, according to a report from The Tolly Group.

Testing multiple solutions in a lab environment designed to simulate a medium-sized enterprise revealed that choosing a variety of best-of-breed products and integrating them -- a common practice in many areas of IT -- "may not be the best option when it comes to security," said Charles Bruno, executive editor at Boca Raton, Fla.-based The Tolly Group.

"Going into it, we anticipated a level of complexity," Bruno said. "What we found was the difference in the time it took to deploy the different solutions was striking."

The Tolly Group looked at a solution comprised of Juniper Networks/NetScreen and Check Point Software Technologies solutions, as well as an integrated offering from Astaro Security Linux. The Juniper and Check Point products were augmented with Trend Micro antivirus and Websense URL-blocking tools.

All told, the report estimates that the Astaro offering would take 72 hours to install and support during the first year of operation, while the Juniper/NetScreen option would require 139 hours and the Check Point option 184 hours. The integrated solution was also faster when it came to defining server and host entries and on monthly backup of the system configuration.

That time translates to cost, Bruno said, and adds

    Requires Free Membership to View

    SearchSecurity.com members gain immediate and unlimited access to breaking industry news, virus alerts, new hacker threats, highly focused security newsletters, and more -- all at no cost. Join me on SearchSecurity.com today!

    Michael S. Mimoso, Editorial Director

    By submitting your registration information to SearchSecurity.com you agree to receive email communications from TechTarget and TechTarget partners. We encourage you to read our Privacy Policy which contains important disclosures about how we collect and use your registration and other information. If you reside outside of the United States, by submitting this registration information you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Your use of SearchSecurity.com is governed by our Terms of Use. You may contact us at webmaster@TechTarget.com.

up to a "penalty" during the first year of deployment. "Network admins are still going to have to decide whether a best-of-breed option is right for them," he added.

Jim Hurley, VP at Boston-based Aberdeen Group, said security professionals often prefer best-of-breed offerings, despite the added work of integration. However, the waves of consolidation that have hit the security industry have produced more all-in-one solutions that are being looked at more closely.

The test simulated a 1,200-person company with three satellite offices running VPNs, firewalls, antispam, antivirus and URL filtering tools. Bruno said the study may hold a lesson for larger enterprises "We've shown that in this case at least, an integrated solution can save a lot of time," he said.


Join the conversationComment

Share
Comments

    Results

    Contribute to the conversation

    All fields are required. Comments will appear at the bottom of the article.