Home > Security News > Legacy protocol puts IBM mainframes at risk
Security News:
EMAIL THIS

Legacy protocol puts IBM mainframes at risk

By Victor R. Garza, Contributor
29 Aug 2006 | SearchSecurity.com

Security Wire Daily News
Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us    Add to Google

LAS VEGAS -- A security researcher at the recent DefCon USA 2006 hacker conference believes IBM mainframes, many of which store and process millions of transactions each day, could be vulnerable to attack, putting those transactions at risk.

Martyn Ruks, a UK-based penetration tester and security researcher, outlined a methodology for attacking IBM mainframes running the Systems Network Architecture (SNA) protocol, the proprietary IBM networking protocol created more than 30 years ago and commonly used by IBM mainframes and iSeries (AS/400) computers. Despite the emergence of cheaper alternatives, such systems have been mainstays in corporate data centers for years because of their reliability in running mission-critical finance, inventory and point-of-sale applications.

Ruks detailed how a script written in the Python programming language allows an individual to query a Data-Link Switching (DLSw)-capable router and allow for information gathering of the router version, MAC address, NetBIOS name and other relevant information as part of the "footprinting," or data gathering phase of an intrusion.

Listing several ways to gain credentials for mainframe access, Ruks also spoke about gaining access to routers, including those from networking vendor Cisco Systems Inc. that, if not properly patched, could leak information from DLSw circuits or be directly compromised.

The proof-of-concept Python script "only takes you about halfway to the goal," Ruks provided direction for writing SNA attack scripts to exploit vulnerable systems.

Ruks pointed out several weaknesses as a methodological approach, as opposed to a specific new attack vector. As with all attacks, if the routers aren't patched or the networks aren't secured properly, they are vulnerable to a number of older attacks. He commented that since these systems are not seen as low hanging fruit, many companies neglect to properly secure these systems.

He said several of his clients hadn't patched their routers and, with a little SNA knowledge, this could allow an attacker a means into the network. He also said that there was little literature on the subject and that attackers must be well-versed in SNA infrastructure to properly exploit the issue.

But let there be no mistake, he said: After fully exploiting the weakness, an attacker can do just about anything he wants with a victimized mainframe.

Black Hat USA 2006

Ruks also illustrated before and after diagrams of local and remote attack procedures, and offered recommendations for protecting the routers and communications channels to the mainframe, including turning on encryption between routers and on communication channels on the network, along with other networking and security best practices.

While Ruks gave the caveat that a properly configured and maintained network -- along with network administrators supporting best practices -- can harden these systems from attack, he said his experiences this hasn't always been the case.

Ruks outlined that while these SNA networked systems may be old relative to other technologies, a large number of these systems are still used by large corporations to support mission critical and high value applications along with their valuable data. Yet he said it is the combination of SNA alongside more contemporary systems running TCP/IP that exposes mainframes to attack.

Following the presentation, a Cisco spokesperson acknowledged interest in Ruks' talk and stated that Cisco will start a communications channel with Ruks.

Victor R. Garza is a technology/security consultant and lecturer at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, Calif.

Tags: Alternative OS security: Mac, Linux, Unix, etc.VIEW ALL TAGS

Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us    Add to Google



RELATED CONTENT
Alternative OS security: Mac, Linux, Unix, etc.
Machiavelli Mac OS X rootkit unveiled at Black Hat
How secure is 'Platform as a Service (PaaS)?'
Security comparison: Mac OS X vs. Windows
Mac OS memory flaws pose challenges for enterprise endpoint protection
Rootkit Hunter demo: Detect and remove Linux rootkits
Oracle to buy Sun Microsystems for $7.4 billion
How to harden Linux operating systems
Serious holes in Mac OS X memory, researcher shows
What is the best operating system for an FTP server implementation?
Black Hat DC 2009: Mac OS attack method
Alternative OS security: Mac, Linux, Unix, etc. Research

RELATED GLOSSARY TERMS
Terms from Whatis.com − the technology online dictionary
trusted computing  (SearchSecurity.com)

RELATED RESOURCES
2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems
Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts
Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary



More Tips to Secure Your Network
TechTarget Security Media
Information Security View this month\\'s issue and subscribe today.
Information Security Decisions Apply online for free conference admission.
SearchSecurity.com
HomeNewsMagazineMultimediaWhite PapersLearningAdviceTopicsEventsAbout Us

About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
TechTarget provides technology professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective purchase decisions and managing their organizations' technology projects - with its network of technology-specific websites, events and online magazines.

TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Site Map




All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2003 - 2009, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
  TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts