Home > Security Tips > Web Security Advisor > Ensuring Web application security during a company merger
Security Tips:
EMAIL THIS
 TIPS & NEWSLETTERS TOPICS 

WEB SECURITY ADVISOR

Ensuring Web application security during a company merger


Michael Cobb
06.14.2007
Rating: -2.00- (out of 5)


Enterprise IT tips and expert advice
Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us    Add to Google


This tip is part of SearchSecurity.com's Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions Security Learning Guide.

Mergers and acquisitions create a challenging set of circumstances for IT departments. Although deals may be announced quickly, the systems integration efforts that follow can take several months -- if not years -- to complete.

It's common for a newly combined organization to try to improve its efficiency by combining its Web application infrastructures. While such an endeavour can lead to a number of security-related challenges, the best path to success requires an unbiased examination of security mechanisms and informed decisions on which ones work best and which need to be added or replaced.

Web application merger risk analysis
When two organizations merge, it's certain that they will have different security philosophies, policies, technologies and requirements regarding Web application security. For example, an ecommerce site that allows customers to track order progress has to permit deeper access into the back-end system than one that merely generates an email once the order is completed. Change control could be another area of conflict if one organization has embraced blog and wiki technologies to communicate with employees and customers.

For more information

In this tip, Joel Dubin explains the compliance issues that arise during a company merger.

Listen to security pros and experts share their thoughts in this podcast focusing on vendor consolidation.

Senior News Writer Bill Brenner breaks down the negative customer impact of security vendor acquisitions.
Because of each company's separate approaches and needs, a combined team from both organizations must be charged with assessing the new entity's risk exposure and setting targets for the merged Web security operation. This risk analysis, which should take place during the due diligence review of the acquired company, involves identifying the key business drivers, workflow needs, budgets, timelines and performance benchmarks in order to gain an understanding of the security policies and the business logic behind the existing security infrastructure.

But before the two merging organizations combine their Web application infrastructures, a comprehensive penetration test should evaluate the strength of their perimeter defenses, as well as the security of remote access and third-party connections. During this period, both organizations should continue to operate separately. Once these tasks have been completed, the organizations' security postures will be clear. Penetration tests can help determine whether fundamental security objectives are being met and flag any shortcomings that might have implications for the merging of Web-based applications.

Security is often linked directly to specific applications, particularly Web-based ones. Before implementing any changes in security defenses and procedures, you will need to evaluate their impact. Probably the greatest area of concern will arise once customer-information databases have been consolidated. Application and user access privileges should be reassessed and data validation routines on all applications re-evaluated to ensure they correctly handle any changes to data fields. Any changes to the way an application processes information should be reviewed to ensure that the application isn't suddenly vulnerable to a logic-based attack. Next, business continuity and disaster recovery plans should be updated and tested, along with physical security and incident response procedures. As the organizations begin to merge, network capacity issues may arise. During any transition, system and application stability need to be monitored so that disruption to business processes is kept to a minimum.

Conclusion
Although it is a challenge to maintain Web application security during mergers, such events provide an opportunity to reduce costs, impose a standard set of security technologies and look at new ideas and security management models. Many organizations find it useful to have a central security figure that is responsible for all security processes. It is often considered a more effective model, as it ensures that security is more coordinated and resources are better utilized. After all, resource utilization is what drives company mergers in the first place.


Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions Security Learning Guide
  M&A: Merging network security policies
  Best practices for compliance during a merger
  Ensuring Web application security when companies merge
  Mergers and acquisitions: Building up security after an M&A

About the author:
Michael Cobb, CISSP-ISSAP is the founder and managing director of Cobweb Applications Ltd., a consultancy that offers IT training and support in data security and analysis. He co-authored the book IIS Security and has written numerous technical articles for leading IT publications. Mike is the guest instructor for several SearchSecurity.com Security Schools and, as a SearchSecurity.com site expert, answers user questions on application security and platform security.

Rate this Tip
To rate tips, you must be a member of SearchSecurity.com.
Register now to start rating these tips. Log in if you are already a member.




BROWSE BY TAG
Web Security Advisor,   Application and Platform Security,   Web Application Security,   Web Security Tools and Best Practices,   Vendor Management: Negotiations, Budgeting, Mergers and Acquisitions,   Information Security Management,   Business Management: Security Support and Executive Communications,   VIEW ALL TAGS

Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us    Add to Google



RELATED CONTENT
Web Security Advisor
DNS rebinding defenses still necessary, thanks to Web 2.0
New defenses for automated SQL injection attacks
PCI compliance and Web applications: Code review or firewalls?
Worst practices: Bad security incidents to avoid
Web scanning and reporting best practices
Social networking Web site threats manageable with good enterprise policy
Enterprise security in 2008: Building trust into the application development process
PCI DSS Section 6: A plan for tackling application security
Making the case for Web application vulnerability scanners
Preparing for uniform resource identifier (URI) exploits

Web Application Security
Preventing SQL injection attacks: A network admin's perspective
Cisco acquires SaaS security vendor ScanSafe
Web application firewall use goes beyond compliance, company finds
Gumblar Trojan drive-by exploits spike following Adobe update
Some Facebook applications lead to Russian attack sites
Barracuda acquires Purewire expanding Web security reach
An enterprise strategy for Web application security threats
Scanning with N-Stalker offers basic Web application security assessment
Attackers target PDF, DirectShow flaws with malicious banner ads
New Bahama botnet evades search engines, fuels click fraud

Vendor Management: Negotiations, Budgeting, Mergers and Acquisitions
M86 buys Web security gateway vendor Finjan
McAfee survey finds faults in midmarket enterprise security
Cisco acquires SaaS security vendor ScanSafe
Email archiving vendor sues Gartner over Magic Quadrant
Analyst calls Barracuda-Purewire deal proof of cloud dominance
Barracuda acquires Purewire expanding Web security reach
McAfee, Verizon Business partner to develop cloud security services
Security vendors can learn from ConSentry Networks demise
Security on a budget: How to make the most of authentication tools
2009 Information Security magazine Readers' Choice Awards

RELATED GLOSSARY TERMS
Terms from Whatis.com − the technology online dictionary
anonymous Web surfing  (SearchSecurity.com)
buffer overflow  (SearchSecurity.com)
cache cramming  (SearchSecurity.com)
cookie poisoning  (SearchSecurity.com)
dictionary attack  (SearchSecurity.com)
distributed denial-of-service attack  (SearchSecurity.com)
JavaScript hijacking  (SearchSecurity.com)
National Computer Security Center  (SearchSecurity.com)
threat modeling  (SearchSecurity.com)
trigraph  (SearchSecurity.com)

RELATED RESOURCES
2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems
Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts
Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary

DISCLAIMER: Our Tips Exchange is a forum for you to share technical advice and expertise with your peers and to learn from other enterprise IT professionals. TechTarget provides the infrastructure to facilitate this sharing of information. However, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or validity of the material submitted. You agree that your use of the Ask The Expert services and your reliance on any questions, answers, information or other materials received through this Web site is at your own risk.



Research Solutions for Network Security, Access Control and Security Threats
TechTarget Security Media
Information Security View this month\\'s issue and subscribe today.
Information Security Decisions Apply online for free conference admission.
SearchSecurity.com
HomeNewsMagazineMultimediaWhite PapersLearningAdviceTopicsEventsAbout Us

About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
TechTarget provides technology professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective purchase decisions and managing their organizations' technology projects - with its network of technology-specific websites, events and online magazines.

TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Site Map




All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2003 - 2009, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
  TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts