Home > Security Tips > Security Buyer's Guide > Demand good proposals: Tips for writing an RFP
Security Tips:
EMAIL THIS
 TIPS & NEWSLETTERS TOPICS 

SECURITY BUYER'S GUIDE

Demand good proposals: Tips for writing an RFP


Jon Oltsik
06.13.2005
Rating: -4.33- (out of 5)


Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   


When you publish a Request for Proposal (RFP), you're looking for responses that tell you clearly and concisely how a security vendor is going to solve your problem. Too often, though, you're left reading through page after page of marketing filler laced with company acronyms, with little or no sense of what it means to your environment -- heck, you can get that off the vendor's Web site.

IT security professionals don't have time for this. Some proposals are so painful to get through that organizations would simply eliminate them outright regardless of how well the solution might fit.

The RFP response is an opportunity for vendors to earn your business. Write the RFP as concisely as possible and include a description about your mandates for responses. It's time to define some ground rules. Vendors won't stop playing wasteful marketing games until users set expectations on what is acceptable.

Below are five guidelines that will improve prospects for proposals that actually respond directly to your requirements.

  1. All questions and requirements must be addressed directly
    This means the vendor needs to avoid the marketing rhetoric and acronyms, and simply address the specific needs presented in the document. A vendor that can't meet a certain requirement should be honest and state this in plain English. Fulfilling this requirement requires conciseness, not unbearable detail -- figure five to seven pages of text in most cases. A well-prepared and thorough RFP response (supported by graphics and figures) may be longer than seven pages; the point, however, is that useful content is good, marketing double-talk is bad.

  2. The response should include details about architecture and deployment
    Vendors love to talk about features and benefits but often forget to address the physical layout of their solutions or the effort required for implementation projects. Where do the components sit? How will a distributed solution communicate? Are there security concerns? Are there deployment options or complexities to consider? Can a solution tier administration? Can it be implemented in either a distributed or centralized fashion? Can it be configured so it is efficient in terms of network bandwidth? Remember, the vendors are the technology experts here, so they should be creative and meticulous.

  3. Text must be supported with graphics
    A proposal should weave together graphics and text in an effort to make the document both succinct and thorough. Insist that vendors include graphics that illustrate how it addresses requirements. For example, distributed solutions should be supported by topology maps that help users visualize the product architecture. Management tools should include screen shots that specifically address user needs.

  4. Comprehensive pricing is required
    Software and maintenance costs are only a piece of the puzzle. What about additional hardware like servers, switches or management consoles? Will you need a back-end database? How about professional services and user training? Again, demand that vendors "walk a mile in your shoes" and provide details, not a runaround.

  5. A business solution must speak to your needs
    The RFP response should reveal that the vendor understands your business issues, addresses them effectively and can deliver near-term ROI. State your business problems clearly and demand that the vendor respond in kind.

About the author
Jon Oltsik is a senior analyst at the Enterprise Strategy Group, and previously VP of marketing and strategy at GiantLoop Network and senior analyst at Forrester Research.

Rate this Tip
To rate tips, you must be a member of SearchSecurity.com.
Register now to start rating these tips. Log in if you are already a member.




BROWSE BY TAG
Security Buyer's Guide,   Application and Platform Security,   Enterprise Vulnerability Management,   Security Patch Management,   Vendor Management: Negotiations, Budgeting, Mergers and Acquisitions,   Information Security Management,   VIEW ALL TAGS

Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   



RELATED CONTENT
Security Buyer's Guide
Keystroke dynamics makes BioPassword Internet Edition a viable authentication option
Access security with KoolSpan's SecurEdge
NetChk Protect 5.5
Biometrics: Best practices, future trends
2006 Products of the Year: Emerging Technologies
Secure Sphere 2.0
Scan & Deliver: SLAs force service providers and outsources to hit the mark ... or hit the road
Secure remote access: SSH Tectia Manager
Spycatcher Enterprise 3.2
Configuresoft's Enterprise Configuration Manager v4.7

Security Patch Management
Microsoft gives Internet Explorer a major security overhaul
Information security book excerpts and reviews
What patch management metrics does Project Quant use?
Squad: Tokenization, Phishing and the Feds
Should management processes change based on a patch release schedule?
Should Windows Mobile updates come from Microsoft?
Adobe updates ColdFusion, JRun, Flex
Trusteer CEO criticizes Adobe, touts better patch deployments
Patch management study shows IT taking significant risks
Vulnerability mitigation study shows need for faster patching

Vendor Management: Negotiations, Budgeting, Mergers and Acquisitions
Database activity monitoring lacks security lift
IBM to acquire database security firm Guardium
Cost of security, IT management add up at healthcare facilities, study finds
Part 2: Marcus Ranum on the state of information security
Part 4: Marcus Ranum on the state of information security
M86 buys Web security gateway vendor Finjan
McAfee survey finds faults in midmarket enterprise security
Cisco acquires SaaS security vendor ScanSafe
Email archiving vendor sues Gartner over Magic Quadrant
Analyst calls Barracuda-Purewire deal proof of cloud dominance

RELATED GLOSSARY TERMS
Terms from Whatis.com − the technology online dictionary
attack vector  (SearchSecurity.com)
back door  (SearchSecurity.com)
ethical worm  (SearchSecurity.com)
Patch Tuesday  (SearchSecurity.com)
zero-day exploit  (SearchSecurity.com)

RELATED RESOURCES
2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems
Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts
Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary

DISCLAIMER: Our Tips Exchange is a forum for you to share technical advice and expertise with your peers and to learn from other enterprise IT professionals. TechTarget provides the infrastructure to facilitate this sharing of information. However, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or validity of the material submitted. You agree that your use of the Ask The Expert services and your reliance on any questions, answers, information or other materials received through this Web site is at your own risk.



Research Solutions for Network Security, Access Control and Security Threats
TechTarget Security Media
Information Security View this month\\'s issue and subscribe today.
Information Security Decisions Apply online for free conference admission.
SearchSecurity.com
HomeNewsMagazineMultimediaWhite PapersLearningAdviceTopicsEventsAbout Us

About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
TechTarget provides technology professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective purchase decisions and managing their organizations' technology projects - with its network of technology-specific websites, events and online magazines.

TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Site Map




All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2003 - 2010, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
  TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts