So, where might SSO fit in? Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that companies prove they have sufficient...
IT controls in place to protect the broader financial controls mandated specifically by the legislation. Although Section 404 is vague when it comes to specific recommendations, it sheds light on auditor requirements. IT controls should be documented and prove that there are adequate policies and procedures for protecting data, including access control, encryption, firewalls and antivirus protection.
With that in mind, one secret to SSO implementation is the centralization of authentication on specialized SSO servers and architectures. Unlike standard authentication systems, SSO is usually pretty complicated. It requires a lot of planning – that could mean documentation – and has to integrate into existing authentication systems. Aside from the documentation, these systems also require more tuning, auditing and logging to stay healthy and hacker-free than simpler authentication systems to single applications or networks.
It's this centralization, combined with the documentation of logging and auditing of systems needed to run SSO that will probably impress your auditors trying to boost your compliance efforts.
More on single sign-on and compliance:
Dig Deeper on Single-sign on (SSO) and federated identity
Related Q&A from Joel Dubin
Ensuring authenticity of online communications is critical to conduct business. Learn how to use a public key and private key in digital signatures ... Continue Reading
Learn about the purpose of CAPTCHA challenges that enable websites to differentiate bots from authentic users to stop spammers from hijacking forums ... Continue Reading
Proper planning is at the top of the list for single sign-on best practices, but it's important to get enterprise SSO implementations off to a good ... Continue Reading